9/11 WTC World Trade Centers The Most Complete Story Part 1

Back


The Real Story To The 9/11 Controversy And Why The Towers Fell (It Was Not Terrorist) Video Also Includes The Collapse Of WTC 7 And How The Owner Doubled Insurance Coverage On The Towers And That President Bushes Brother Was Head Of Security For The Airport And Trade Centers. Also How Security For The WTC Was Halted A Week Before Attacks So They Could Plant Explosives And Then Removed Bomb Sniffing Dogs From There Patrols. This Is The Most Complete WTC Video To Date. If You Want The Complete 1 1/2 Hour Full Screen Copy Send Your Address And Payment Of $18.99 For CD Or $9.99 For The Complete Download To Paypal ID To: jeannempierce2006@yahoo.com

Channel: Film & Animation
Uploaded: April 2, 2007 at 2:57 am
Author: bigdealsusa

Length: 00:09:59
Rating: 4.29
Views: 55206

Tags: WTC World Trade Center Explosion Terrorist Terrorism War New York Iraq Osama Bin Laden 9/11 911 9-11 plane crash attacks

Video Comments:
stubobmusic (July 6, 2008 at 8:18 am)
lol punctualbird jist got owned
IzzySantino (July 5, 2008 at 12:42 pm)
Yeah but the building got lighter as it ascended therefore it would have taken tremendous velocity to crush the heavier undamaged floors beneath.
punctualbird (July 5, 2008 at 7:57 pm)
Look sonny, just because the building was designed with less weight at the top, doesn't mean it's not heavy. If you knew anything about physics (or the design of any of the WTC complex buildings) you wouldn't have posted such an ignorant comment. If you want to look for conspiracy or corruption, you won't find it in 911 videos, you may find evidence of it in White House memos, emails, meeting minutes. Further to that, Bush and members of his adminstration have lied several times on film!
IzzySantino (July 6, 2008 at 3:23 am)
Your personal attack is more ignorant than my valid point. Are you trying to say that the conservation of momentum (a foundational Law of Physics) did not occur here? WTC was 3 buildings placed on top of each other therefore the lightest part of the building would have to impede 2 reinforced sections and everything that the core stood for...
IzzySantino (July 6, 2008 at 3:24 am)
The south tower is observed (top 34 floors) toppling as a section to south and east (inducing the second law of Thermodynamics) but the rotation stops thus breaking the law of angular momentum that can be explained by the pivotal area being pulverised. This would then cause the gravity pull to become unbalanced and place focus on one side of the building.
punctualbird (July 6, 2008 at 5:41 am)
Knowing a couple of big words doesn't make you any more credible than the other "twoofers". Your basic reasoning is flawed. You "twoofers" have made your conclusions prematurely - and try to make the evidence fit the theory, rather than allow the evidence to make the conclusion. Don't think of yourself as important or intelligent enough to be worthy of a personal attack from me. Your ignorance invalidates your point.
IzzySantino (July 6, 2008 at 7:52 am)
Again, you have personally attacked me and have nothing to counter what i've said. Tell me why it is flawed and do not slander someone you do not know.
punctualbird (July 6, 2008 at 10:45 am)
A thousand appologies, I seem to have offended your delicate sensibilities. Had I known you were a school girl, I may have chosen more tender words. The fact that you are on the side of the "twoofers" IS my counter to any point you have to make. It was cute how you tried to sound smart there. Anyway, I've won these debates before, so I don't feel the need to do it with you. I'm just taking cheap shots at you guys for your near mentally retarded reasoning. Try not to cry about it.
IzzySantino (July 6, 2008 at 11:49 am)
Wow, i've underestimated you, i really am dealing with a Ph.D. Run along now Hannity & Colmes is coming on...
punctualbird (July 7, 2008 at 4:03 am)
Oh it's on? That's a thousand times better than listening to anymore bullshit! See ya!